Skip to content

Data to Action

Having data is the first step. Converting it into actions that improve your operation is where real value is generated. This guide helps you establish clear decision frameworks.


┌─────────────┐
│ MEASURE │ ← Capture field data
└──────┬──────┘
┌─────────────┐
│ ANALYZE │ ← Understand what data says
└──────┬──────┘
┌─────────────┐
│ DECIDE │ ← Choose action based on data
└──────┬──────┘
┌─────────────┐
│ ACT │ ← Implement decision
└──────┬──────┘
┌─────────────┐
│ VERIFY │ ← Confirm it worked
└──────┬──────┘
└────────────────────────────▶ (return to MEASURE)

Economic Action Threshold (EAT)

The point where damage cost exceeds treatment cost.

Treatment decision:
IF pest level > EAT
AND hasn't been treated in last X days
AND conditions favor the pest
THEN → Apply treatment
IF pest level near EAT (80-100%)
AND trend is increasing
THEN → Monitor more frequently, prepare treatment
IF pest level < EAT
AND trend is stable or decreasing
THEN → Continue normal monitoring

Cost variation monitoring

Weekly cycle review:
IF actual cost > 110% of budget
THEN → Investigate causes, adjust
- Contractor performance below expected?
- Unplanned tasks added?
- Incorrect prices?
IF delayed tasks > 2 days
THEN → Intervene
- Contractor has problem?
- Lack of supplies?
- Adverse weather?
- Reallocate resources if needed

Yield deviation

IF actual yield < 85% of planned
For 3+ consecutive days
In the same lot
THEN → Investigate
- Health problem in the lot?
- Harvest group with difficulties?
- Was original estimate correct?

│ URGENT │ NOT URGENT
──────────────┼───────────────────┼───────────────────
│ │
IMPORTANT │ ① DO NOW │ ② SCHEDULE
│ - Critical alert │ - Improve processes
│ - Pest above EAT │ - Train team
│ - Zero stock │ - Adjust thresholds
│ │
──────────────┼───────────────────┼───────────────────
│ │
NOT IMPORTANT │ ③ DELEGATE │ ④ ELIMINATE
│ - Minor fixes │ - Reports nobody
│ - Data │ reads
│ corrections │ - Obsolete
│ │ processes

For each important action, document:

📋 DECISION LOG
Date: Jan 31, 2025
Problem: Mites > 10/leaf in North Lot
Data: Average 12.3/leaf, increasing trend 3 weeks
Decision: Apply acaricide (product X, dose Y)
Responsible: Eng. Garcia
Action date: Feb 2, 2025
Verification: Re-monitor Feb 7, 2025
Result (added later):
- Post-treatment level: 2.1/leaf
- Effectiveness: Good
- Notes: Consider preventive treatment in similar
conditions

❌ "I need more data before deciding"
(when there's already enough information)
✓ "With this data, the best action is X.
We'll monitor the result."
❌ "The data confirms what I thought"
(ignoring contradicting data)
✓ "Data shows Y, although I expected Z.
I need to adjust my understanding."
❌ "One high value = immediate action"
(without considering context or trend)
✓ "This value is high. Let's verify if it's
a trend or anomaly before acting."

Clear communication:
WHAT: "We'll apply acaricide in North Lot"
WHY: "Levels exceed action threshold"
WHEN: "Tomorrow morning"
WHO: "Application team"
FOLLOW-UP: "Re-monitoring in 7 days"

  1. Executive Reports - Share decisions and results
  2. Alert System - Automate condition detection
  3. Dashboard - Monitor key indicators